HDPE

2021 Geosynthetics Conference Virtual

February 22, 2021

SCS Engineers Project Director Neil Nowak is presenting at the virtual 2021 Geosynthetics conference, February 22-25, 2021.

Neil is presenting on HDPE Lined Produced Water Evaporation and Recycling Ponds.

This live virtual event is hosted by the Geosynthetic Materials Association (GMA), a division of Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI) and is co-located with the International Erosion Control Association (IECA) Region One Annual Conference and Expo.

The Geosynthetics Virtual Conference 2021 is where the industry unites to share developments across the geotechnical, civil and geo-engineering communities. The co-location with the IECA Annual Conference and Expo offers expanded education and networking opportunities.

Connect with industry professionals and immerse yourself in a sea of knowledge through short courses, plenary sessions, technical papers and panel discussions presented by industry experts from both conferences.

Visit the virtual exhibit halls to see the latest developments in geotechnical and erosion control products and services offered by the industry’s top companies and organizations.

The Conference Features

  • Interactive virtual exhibit halls
  • Engaging keynote lectures
  • Virtual networking opportunities
  • Participate in panel discussions
  • Special industry sessions
  • Technical paper sessions on-demand
  • Co-location with IECA Annual
  • Conference and Expo (experience 2 shows for the price of 1!)

 

Click for more information and to register

 

 

 

Posted by Laura Dorn at 8:00 am

SCS Advice from the Field: How to compensate for the effect of the ambient temperature variations on the pressure changes within the pipe during HDPE pipe pressure testing using incompressible fluid

February 17, 2016

pipe air test
Testing the 18” diameter gas header, which operates under vacuum.

Pressure testing of HDPE pipes takes place at almost every landfill lining system and landfill gas collection system construction project. The pipes must be tested to make sure the fusion welds are intact and are not leaking. When engineers specify pressure testing, they identify the required test pressure, the duration of the test, and the allowable pressure drop at the completion of the test. The test pressure may vary from one pipe application to another. For example, the specified test pressure may be as high as 1.5 to 2 times the maximum service pressure in the pipe for leachate forcemain pipes; whereas for pipes used in landfill gas collection systems, where the pipes are under vacuum, the specified test pressure may be less. Test duration may vary from one hour to a few hours, and the allowable pressure drop may vary from zero to a percentage of the initial pressure.

The 150 psi gauge reading is the test pressure for 2” compressed air lines to air pumps inside condensate sumps.
The 150 psi gauge reading is the test pressure for 2” compressed air lines to air pumps inside condensate sumps.

What is often missing from pressure test specifications is the effect of the ambient temperature variation on the pressure changes within the pipe during the test. If incompressible fluid (e.g., water) is used for pressure testing, pressure changes due to ambient temperature variations are less significant than when compressible fluid (e.g., air) is used.

For incompressible fluids, SCS has developed a mathematical model that enables the engineer or contractor to calculate pressure changes due to ambient temperature variations during the test. The calculated pressure change should be considered when evaluating whether the test results are passing or failing. Increasing ambient temperatures during the test may cause expansion in the pipe, and the expansion causes an additional pressure drop that is not caused by any leak in the welds. On the other hand, decreasing ambient temperatures may cause contraction in the pipe, which increases pressure in the pipe. In this case, a pressure drop due a leak in the weld may not be detected because of a higher pressure created inside the pipe due to pipe contraction. It is recommended that engineers or contractors use the mathematical model to calculate a modified allowable pressure drop by considering the calculated pressure change (positive for pipe expansion or negative for pipe contraction) before the pass/fail assessment is carried out.

The 70 psi gauge reading is the test pressure for 4” condensate force mains.
The 70 psi gauge reading is the test pressure for 4” condensate force mains.

Recently during the test period in the field, a pressure drop was experienced that slightly exceeded the specified allowable pressure drop. Field staff reported ambient temperature variation during the two-hour test. When the modified allowable pressure drop was calculated using SCS’s model to account for the ambient temperature variation, the test ended up passing. Note that field documentation is extremely important for assessing the pass/fail results. This becomes even more important when the specified test duration is several hours long and the ambient temperature variation is significant.

Questions? Contact Ali Khatami, PhD, PE, LEP, CGC, is a Project Director and a Vice President of SCS Engineers. He is also our National Expert for Landfill Design and Construction Quality Assurance. He has nearly 40 years of research and professional experience in mechanical, structural, and civil engineering. Dr. Khatami has acquired extensive experience and knowledge in the areas of geology, hydrogeology, hydrology, hydraulics, construction methods, material science, construction quality assurance (CQA), and stability of earth systems. Dr. Khatami has applied this experience in the siting of numerous landfills and the remediation of hazardous waste contaminated sites.

Read more here. Pass/Fail Criterion for HDPE Pipe Pressure Testing Using Incompressible Fluid, in Talking Trash, March 2015

Learn more here.

Posted by Diane Samuels at 6:00 am