SCS Engineers

September 19, 2025

Alert of regulatory changes or proposed changes for municipalities and industry.

On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the next steps regarding regulatory efforts to address the cleanup of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). In the press release, EPA Administrator Zeldin said, “…we will need new statutory language from Congress to fully address our concerns with passive receiver liability.”

CERCLA imposes broad, retroactive, and potentially costly strict liability on those who release hazardous substances to the environment. This liability can sometimes attach to entities that did not manufacture or generate the substance but received it in feedstocks, products, or landfilled waste. The EPA refers to these entities as “passive receivers.” Members of Congress received testimony and input from various industries, including private and municipal landfills, and passed it to the EPA, which intends to continue working with Congress. No workshops or additional input forums were announced.

The major concern for passive PFOA and PFOS contamination receivers, including local municipalities and service providers, is potentially passing decontamination costs onto ratepayers, taxpayers, and consumers. EPA will continue to collect information on its costs and benefits, but feels the best solution to this issue is a statutory fix to protect passive receivers from liability.

For now, EPA is retaining the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) hazardous substance designation for PFOA and PFOS and will initiate future rulemaking to establish a uniform framework governing the designation of hazardous substances under section 102(a) of CERCLA moving forward. The current rule mandates reporting of releases of one pound or more of PFOA or PFOS within 24 hours. It designates Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane sulfonic Acid (PFOS) as CERCLA hazardous substances. See 42 U.S.C §9602; Docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0341.

According to the EPA, a CERCLA section 102(a) Framework Rule would provide a uniform approach to guide future hazardous substance designations, including how the agency will consider the costs of proposed designations. Section 102(a) gives the EPA authority to designate additional hazardous substances beyond those listed under the other statutes referenced in CERCLA (the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act). Once finalized, the 102(a) Framework Rule would provide a uniform approach for future designations.

In response to the EPA’s August 26, 2022, proposed rule to list PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances, numerous comments were submitted requesting that the final CERCLA HS rule include exemptions or similar liability relief for passive receivers that did not generate the chemicals – e.g., landfills, wastewater treatment facilities, and water supply systems.

Background

EPA’s May 8, 2024, final CERCLA HS rule did not provide an exemption. However, EPA’s April 19, 2024, Memorandum entitled “PFAS Enforcement Discretion and Settlement Policy Under CERCLA” outlines enforcement discretion considerations for the following entities:

(1) Community water systems and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs)

(2) Municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s);

(3) Publicly owned/operated municipal solid waste landfills;

(4) Publicly owned airports and local fire departments; and

(5) Farms where biosolids are applied to the land.

Despite the enforcement discretion policy, some passive receivers were disappointed that the agency did not provide stronger liability protection. Based on EPA’s September 2025 press release (above), EPA now plans to take a closer look at the issue, including the possibility of providing a statutory fix to protect passive receivers from liability.

 

If you have questions regarding this rule, please get in touch with SCS Engineers.

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 3:11 pm

September 19, 2025

SCS Engineers is excited to join the NWTC Advanced Manufacturing & Engineering (STEM) Career Fair!

We look forward to meeting Northeast WI School of Innovation High School Seniors from 10:00 – 11:00 a.m., and connecting with all NWTC students between 11:15 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.

SCS Engineers provides innovative environmental consulting and engineering solutions in solid waste management, renewable energy, remediation, and sustainable infrastructure. Whether you’re exploring full-time roles, internships, part-time work, or networking opportunities, our team is eager to share how you can grow your career and make an impact with SCS.

Posted by Brianna Morgan at 11:21 am

September 19, 2025

SCS Engineers is proud to take part in Engineering Career Night at Messiah University.

This event provides students the opportunity to network with industry professionals, attend targeted workshops, and explore career paths across engineering disciplines. Join us in Brubaker Auditorium at the Eisenhower Campus Complex to connect with our team and learn more about internships, co-ops, and full-time roles with SCS Engineers.

At SCS, we combine engineering expertise with a passion for sustainability—delivering innovative solutions in solid waste management, renewable energy, remediation, and infrastructure. We look forward to meeting students who are ready to plan their careers and make an impact in their communities.

Posted by Brianna Morgan at 11:09 am

September 19, 2025

SCS Engineers is excited to attend Day 2 of the upcoming career fair focused on Architecture, Construction, and Structural Design and Engineering roles!

With more than 50 years of experience, SCS provides innovative environmental engineering and consulting services in solid waste management, renewable energy, remediation, and sustainable infrastructure. We’re looking forward to connecting with students and alumni across 11 colleges and 190+ degree programs who are eager to explore careers that combine engineering expertise with real-world impact.

Join us on Day 2 to learn more about internships, Co-Op placements, and full-time opportunities at SCS Engineers. Whether you’re just beginning your journey or preparing for your next step, you’ll find exciting ways to grow your career while making a positive difference for communities and the environment.

Posted by Brianna Morgan at 10:48 am

August 19, 2025

Dr Aicha Slassi Senou, SCS Engineers
Aicha Slassi Senou, PHD, Joins SCS Engineers as a Project Manager.

 

Please join SCS Engineers in welcoming Dr. Aicha Slassi Senou to our Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Climate Change Practice.

Dr. Slassi Senou brings over 10 years of expertise as a GHG and sustainability expert in GHG accounting, decarbonization planning, and life cycle assessments. She has successfully delivered over 30 third-party verified Corporate GHG Inventories for scopes 1, 2, and 3 by responding to auditors’ technical questions about data collection, calculations, in alignment with the World Resources Institute’s GHG Protocol’s Corporate Standards, and ISO 14064-1. She is skilled in managing corporate climate and GHG projects, including GHG inventories and climate disclosures, including reporting to the Science Based Targets Initiative and CDP.

Her experience includes end-to-end GHG inventory development for corporate clients from various sectors, including services and manufacturing. Over the last two years, she has experience ensuring compliance with GHG Protocol standards across Scopes 1, 2, and 3 for 45 corporate inventories. She has demonstrated deep technical expertise across all 15 Scope 3 categories. Dr. Slassi Senou delivered sector-specific decarbonization strategies, including value chain engagement for a Fortune 50 manufacturer and net-zero road mapping for multiple clients.

Victoria Evans, SCS’s National Expert on Climate Change, has this to add:

Aicha’s a formidable addition to our deep bench of engineers, scientists, and consultants. In addition to her expertise, she completed two Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) Climate Corps Fellowships, one with Hershey’s Company and one with Meta Inc.

Her background includes laboratory research on biochar’s carbon and environmental benefits from alternative feedstocks. She worked at Moody’s as a Corporate Sustainability Reporting (CSR) analyst on ESG data collection, analysis, and comparative ranking of corporations relative to their peers.

 

WELCOME TO SCS ENGINEERS!

We’re sure Aicha will be pleased to hear from you. Please extend a greeting on LinkedIn.

Additional Resources:

 

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 6:00 am

August 14, 2025

2025 Phoenix Award Winner
Pictured left and right are Sven-Erik Kaiser and Linda Garczynski (EPA Reps and event MCs), and Eric Williams of SCS accepting for IQHQ in the center.

 

Phoenix Awards reflect the progression of brownfield redevelopment over the past 20+ years by recognizing extraordinary practitioners and projects by the EPA.

SCS Engineers expresses gratitude to IQHQ, the EPA, and the San Diego community for their collective support in achieving a Phoenix Award that features the RaDD project as an exemplary model of innovative environmental remediation and sustainable design, demonstrating how large-scale redevelopment can address environmental challenges while enhancing community quality of life and promoting economic and environmental benefits for future generations.

award-winning brownfields SCS Engineers
Courtesy of IQHQ

IQHQ’s RaDD project exemplifies a transformative redevelopment of San Diego’s waterfront, integrating sustainability and environmental stewardship into a life sciences campus. The project involved extensive soil excavation and innovative environmental management to address legacy contamination while promoting economic and community revitalization.

Historic site reclamation: The RaDD project was developed on 15.89 acres of former Navy land reclaimed between 1915 and 1917, involving dredged bay sediments and industrial debris requiring careful environmental management.

Soil management strategy: IQHQ partnered with SCS Engineers to create and implement a rigorous soil management plan, including regulatory collaboration to safely characterize, excavate, and dispose of nearly 800,000 cubic yards of soil, protecting public health during construction.

Innovative contamination treatment: Discovery of 7,000 cubic yards of highly contaminated material led to on-site treatment using a mobile unit and proprietary admixtures under regulatory oversight, reclassifying hazardous waste to reduce disposal costs and saving over $1.1 million.

Sustainable campus features: The 1.7 million square feet RaDD campus includes green spaces, solar power exceeding 0.5 MW, over 200 EV charging stations, and a carbon-neutral building design, aiming for LEED, Fitwel, Smartscore, and WiredScore Platinum certifications in 2025.

Learn more about this award-winning Brownfields redevelopment project here!

 

Actionable Resources:

 

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 2:59 pm

August 4, 2025

Congratulations to Gabrielle Stephens for her promotion to lead SCS’s Southwestern U.S. Air Compliance Group. She brings over two decades of client success to the role.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting or verification, regulatory air compliance, and air permitting services fall within Ms. Stephens’ purview. She leads teams that support clients in the solid waste and manufacturing industries, who find value in having a regulatory liaison to navigate ever-changing federal, state, and local regulations. These teams help maintain efficient operations and enhance business communication with stakeholders.

Regulatory agencies often operate independently, and knowledgeable environmental consultants know how best to meet multiple agency data requirements, resulting in positive relationships between agencies and clients. SCS clients find that improved communication helps minimize or prevent permitting and compliance delays. Agencies, especially air district staff, can depend on the accuracy of Clean Air Act experts who are experienced with newer technologies proven to work, but potentially new in a district.

Ms. Stephens’ experience spans multiple states, numerous air districts and local enforcement agencies.

Beyond her work in air permitting and compliance, Ms. Stephens works on emissions estimates and inventories and has extensive experience preparing permit-to-construct/operate and Title V permit applications. She has also undertaken projects evaluating and reporting to meet the federal Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Rule and the AB 32 Landfill Methane Rule. Her collaborative efforts with the solid waste industry contribute to multiple facilities obtaining landfill gas-to-energy and RNG permits that positively impact air quality.

Ms. Stephens’ air compliance audits, permitting, and compliance reporting for manufacturing facilities, including fiberglass boats, product removers, ceramics, paper products, and cement/aggregates, help ensure regulatory compliance and improve operational efficiency.

We thank Gabrielle for her legacy of shared client successes and look forward to many more years of collaborative achievement!

 

Additional Clean Air Act Resources:

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 6:00 am

July 30, 2025

Join SCS Engineers September 15-17, 2025 in Fort Collins for the Colorado SWANA Fall Conference, the region’s solid waste industry event. This annual gathering brings together professionals, innovators, and thought leaders to share insights, explore solutions, and connect on the future of solid waste management.

This year, we’re excited to announce:

Featured Presentation:
Melissa RussoMelissa Russo
Session: Advancing Drone Technologies for the Solid Waste Industry: Safer, Smarter, and More Efficient Data Collection

Melissa will highlight how SCS’s Remote Monitoring and Control (RMC) team is transforming landfill operations through advanced drone technologies. With a nationwide fleet of FAA-licensed drone pilots and GIS-based data tools, SCS is delivering safer, more efficient, and smarter ways to collect and assess critical site data.

William Haley
Session: 
LF Construction for Integrated Gas Systems

This presentation explores how increasing methane regulations are shaping landfill design and construction. William will discuss strategies for integrating gas collection systems into landfill cells during their development, ensuring gas capture begins as early as filling stages. The session will cover regulatory requirements, design considerations for aligning gas and leachate collection systems, and showcase real-world examples of integrated landfill/gas collection systems with demonstrated performance results.

Register now! We look forward to seeing you in Fort Collins!

Posted by Brianna Morgan at 9:30 am

July 28, 2025

Alert for industry to changes in regulations it must comply with.

 

Recently, Donald Trump issued four executive orders extending Clean Air Act – NESHAP compliance deadlines for a number of specific facilities that provide medical equipment sterilization, burn coal to make electricity, manufacture certain synthetic chemicals, or mine taconite. The big headline is the EPA announcing plans to rescind the ‘endangerment finding’ that allows climate regulation. However, at the same time coal combustion residuals rules are being changed. This Regulatory Alert contains language from the four executive orders, which includes a list of the specific facilities that have been granted extensions to comply. In each order, the President finds that the technology required is not available and that it is in the interest of national security to provide the extensions.

Normally there is a notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedures Act to extend deadlines. If the courts allow the President to continue invoking national security we may see more such executive orders modifying regulations. Follow SCS Engineers on social media to read our SCS Technical Bulletins, which summarize regulatory proposals and changes for public and private entities.

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, proactive planning is critical to preserving flexibility, value, and mitigating risk. We encourage businesses to consult with environmental engineers and consultants and their legal counsel to navigate these changes for continued sustainable success.

 

NESHAP – EtO Rule

On April 5, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final rule, pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412, titled National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:  Ethylene Oxide Emissions Standards for Sterilization Facilities Residual Risk and Technology Review, 89 FR 24090 (EtO Rule).  The EtO Rule imposes new emissions-control requirements on commercial sterilization facilities.

Certain stationary sources subject to the EtO Rule, as identified in Annex I of this proclamation, are exempt from compliance with the EtO Rule for a period of 2 years beyond the EtO Rule’s relevant compliance dates (Exemption).  This Exemption applies to all compliance deadlines established under the EtO Rule applicable to the stationary sources listed in Annex I, with each such deadline extended by 2 years from the date originally required for such deadline.  The effect of this Exemption is that, during each such 2-year period, these stationary sources will remain subject to the emissions and compliance obligations in effect prior to the issuance of the EtO Rule.  In support of this Exemption, I (Trump) hereby make the following determinations:

The technology to implement the EtO Rule is not available.  Such technology does not exist in a commercially viable form sufficient to allow implementation of and compliance with the EtO Rule by the compliance dates set forth in the EtO Rule. It is in the national security interests of the United States to issue this Exemption for the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 and 3 of this proclamation. Link

ANNEX I

International Sterilization Laboratory
Affected Facility/Source: Groveland Facility, Florida

Becton Dickinson and Company

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. BD Covington, Georgia
      2. BD Madison, Georgia
      3. BD Medical, Utah
      4. BD Medical Pharmaceutical Systems, Nebraska
      5. Edwards Lifesciences Technology Sàrl, Puerto Rico

KPR US, LLC d/b/a Kendall Patient Recovery
Affected Facility/Source: Augusta Facility, Georgia

MedXL, LLC

Affected Facility/Source: Ardmore Facility, Oklahoma

Aligned Medical Solutions

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. 1602 4th Ave. Facility, Billings, Montana
      2. 1400 Montana Ave. Facility, Billings, Montana

Professional Contract Sterilization, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source: Taunton Facility, Massachusetts

Sterigenics U.S., LLC

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. Atlanta Facility, Georgia
      2. Charlotte Facility, North Carolina
      3. Grand Prairie Facility, Texas
      4. 4900 S Gifford Ave. Facility, Los Angeles, California
      5. 4801-63 E 50th St. Facility, Los Angeles, California
      6. Ontario Facility, California
      7. Queensbury Facility, New York
      8. Salt Lake City Facility, Utah
      9. Santa Teresa Facility, New Mexico

Cosmed Group, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. Erie Facility, Pennsylvania
      2. Franklin Facility, New Jersey
      3. Linden Facility, New Jersey

Arthrex

Affected Facility/Source: Ave Maria Facilities (2), Florida

Cook Incorporated

Affected Facility/Source: Ellettsville North Facility, Indiana

ALCON Research Ltd.

Affected Facility/Source: ALCON Advance Optic Device Center, North Facility, West Virginia

  1. Braun U.S. Device Manufacturing LLC

Affected Facility/Source: Allentown Manufacturing Facility, Pennsylvania

DeRoyal Industries, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. 1135 Highway 33 South, New Tazewell, Tennessee
      2. 1211 Highway 33 South, New Tazewell, Tennessee

Sterilization Services of Georgia, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source: Atlanta Facility, Georgia

Sterilization Services of Virginia, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source: Richmond Facility, Virginia

Trinity Sterile, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source: Trinity Sterile, Inc., Maryland

LivaNova USA, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source: LivaNova Arvada Facility, Colorado

Covidien LP

Affected Facility/Source: Covidien North Haven Facility, Connecticut

Medtronic Xomed LLC

Affected Facility/Source: Jacksonville Facility, Florida

Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company, Inc.

Affected Facility/Source:

      1. Villalba Facility, Puerto Rico
      2. Juncos Facility, Puerto Rico

Advanced Product Solutions

Affected Facility/Source: Columbia Facility, Alabama

Affected Facility/Source: Salinas, Puerto Rico

Steri-Tech, Inc.

 

NESHAP – MATS Rule

On May 7, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final rule, pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412, titled National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:  Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review, 89 FR 38508 (Rule), which amended the preexisting Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule to make it more stringent.  The Rule’s effective date was July 8, 2024.  Id.  Its compliance date is July 8, 2027, 3 years after its effective date.  See 89 FR 38519.

Certain stationary sources subject to the Rule, as identified in Annex I of this proclamation, are exempt from compliance with the Rule for a period of 2 years beyond the Rule’s compliance date — i.e., for the period beginning July 8, 2027, and concluding July 8, 2029 (Exemption). The effect of this Exemption is that, during this 2-year period, these stationary sources are subject to the compliance obligations that they are currently subject to under the MATS as the MATS existed prior to the Rule.  In support of this Exemption, I (Trump) hereby make the following determinations:

a.  The technology to implement the Rule is not available.  Such technology does not exist in a commercially viable form sufficient to allow implementation of and compliance with the Rule by its compliance date of July 8, 2027.

b.  It is in the national security interests of the United States to issue this Exemption for the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 and 3 of this proclamation. Link

ANNEX I

Affected Facility/Source: Cardinal Unit 1, Unit 2, and Unit 3, Ohio

Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association

Affected Facility/Source: Craig Generating Station Unit 2 and Unit 3, Colorado

City Water, Light and Power

Affected Facility/Source: Dallman Unit 4, Illinois

Cardinal Operating Company

 

NESHAP – HON Rule

On May 16, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final rule titled New Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry, 89 FR 42932 (HON Rule). The HON Rule imposes new emissions-control requirements on certain chemical manufacturing facilities, some of which were promulgated pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412.

Certain stationary sources subject to the HON Rule, as identified in Annex I of this proclamation, are exempt from compliance with those aspects of the HON Rule that were promulgated under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412 for a period of 2 years beyond the HON Rule’s relevant compliance dates (Exemption). This Exemption applies to all compliance deadlines established under the HON Rule applicable to the stationary sources listed in Annex I, with each such deadline extended by 2 years from the date originally required for such deadline. The effect of this Exemption is that, during each such 2-year period, these stationary sources will be subject to the emissions and compliance obligations that they are currently subject to under the applicable standard as that standard existed prior to the HON Rule. In support of this Exemption, I (Trump) hereby make the following determinations:

a.  The technology to implement the HON Rule is not available. Such technology does not exist in a commercially viable form sufficient to allow implementation of and compliance with the HON Rule by the compliance dates in the HON Rule.

b.  It is in the national security interests of the United States to issue this Exemption for the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 and 3 of this proclamation. Link

ANNEX I

  1. Shell Chemical LP
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Geismar Plant, Louisiana
  2. SABIC Innovative Plastics Mt. Vernon, LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Manufacturing Plant, Indiana
  3. Bakelite Synthetics
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Riegelwood, North Carolina;
    b. Conway, North Carolina;
    c. Crossett, Arkansas;
    d. Louisville, Kentucky;
    e. Lufkin, Texas;
    f. Taylorsville, Mississippi
  4. The Dow Chemical Company
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Glycol II Plant, Louisiana
  5. Trinseo LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Trinseo Facility, Georgia
    b. Trinseo Facility, Michigan
  6. Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A.
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Louisiana
    b. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas
  7. Union Carbide Corporation/The Dow Chemical Company
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Seadrift Operations, Texas
    b. Hahnville, St. Charles Parish Facility, Louisiana
  8. Westlake Vinyl’s LLC/Westlake Corporation
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Petrochemical Complex, Louisiana
    b. Styrene Monomer Production Facility, Louisiana
    c. Styrene Marine Terminal, Louisiana
    d. Lake Charles South Facility, Louisiana
    e. Lake Charles North Facility, Louisiana
  9. BASF TotalEnergies Petrochemicals LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Port Arthur Facility, Texas
  10. BASF Corporation
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Geismar Facility, Louisiana;
    b. North Geismar Facility, Louisiana;
    c. Freeport Facility, Texas
  11. Rubicon LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Geismar Facility, Louisiana
  12. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Lake Charles Refinery, Louisiana
    b. Corpus Christi Refinery, Texas
    c. Lemont Refinery, Illinois
  13. INEOS Americas LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Bayport EO Plant, Texas
  14. Celanese Corporation
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Narrows Facility, Virginia
    b. Clear Lake Facility, Texas
    c. Bishop Facility, Texas
    d. Bay City Facility, Texas
  15. Huntsman Petrochemical LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Huntsman Pensacola, Florida
    b. Huntsman Conroe, Texas
  16. TotalEnergies Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc.
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. TotalEnergies Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., Alabama
    b. Cos-Mar StyreneMonomer Plant, Alabama
    c. TotalEnergies Polystrene Plant, Louisiana
    d. Port Arthur Refinery, Texas
  17. Indorama Ventures Xylenes and PTA
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Decatur Facility, Alabama
  18. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: LaPlace Neoprene Production Facility, Louisiana
  19. Sasol Chemicals (USA) LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Lake Charles Chemical Complex, Louisiana
  20. Philips 66 Company
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Sweeny Refinery, Texas
    b. WRB Refining LP Calvert Refinery, Illinois
    c. WRB Refining LP Borger Refinery, Texas
  21. Indorama Ventures Oxides, LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Port Neches Facility, Texas
  22. Eastman Chemical Company
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Longview Facility, Texas
  23. DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Pontchartrain Site, Louisiana
  24. Stepan Company
    i. Affected Facility/Source: Millsdale Facility, Illinois
  25. Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC
    i. Affected Facility/Source:
    a. Ascend Decatur, Alabama;
    b. Ascend Alvin, Texas;
    c. Ascend Pensacola, Florida

 

NESHAP – Taconite Rule

On March 6, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency published a final rule, pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412, titled National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Taconite Iron Ore Processing, 89 FR 16408 (Taconite Rule).  The Taconite Rule imposes new emissions-control requirements on taconite iron ore processing facilities.

Certain stationary sources subject to the Taconite Rule, as identified in Annex I of this proclamation, are exempt from compliance with the Taconite Rule for a period of 2 years beyond the Taconite Rule’s relevant compliance dates (Exemption).The technology to implement the Taconite Rule is not currently available, and it is necessary to issue this Exemption now because long design, permitting, and construction lead times mean that regulated entities will not be able to meet the relevant compliance deadlines absent compliance relief. This Exemption applies to all compliance deadlines established under the Taconite Rule, with each such deadline extended by 2 years from the date originally required for such deadline. The effect of this Exemption is that, during each such 2-year period, these stationary sources are subject to the emissions and compliance obligations that they are currently subject to under the applicable standard as that standard existed prior to the Taconite Rule. In support of this Exemption, I (Trump) hereby make the following determinations:

a.  The technology to implement the Taconite Rule is not available.  Such technology does not exist in a commercially viable form sufficient to allow implementation of and compliance with the Taconite Rule by the compliance dates in the Taconite Rule.

b.  It is in the national security interests of the United States to issue this Exemption for the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 and 3 of this proclamation. Link

ANNEX I

  1.  United States Steel Corporation
    i.    Affected Facility/Source:
    i.    Keetac Plant, Keewatin, Minnesota
    ii.   Minntac Plant, Mountain Iron, Minnesota2.    Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
    i.    Affected Facility/Source:
    i.    United Taconite, Minnesota
    ii.   Northshore Mining, Minnesota
    iii.  Hibbing Taconite, Minnesota
    iv.   Minorca Mine, Minnesota
    v.    Tilden Mine, Michigan
    vi.   Empire Mine, Michigan

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 6:00 am

July 21, 2025

capturing and sequestering CO2

On April 17, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it will extend the compliance deadlines for coal combustion residual (CCR) management unit (CCRMU) requirements. This action will allow facilities to submit both sections of the Facility Evaluation Report simultaneously, provided that both reports are turned in no later than February 8, 2027. 

EPA is also extending the groundwater monitoring requirements for owners or operators of coal combustion residual management units until August 8, 2029. Because the Facility Evaluation Report and groundwater monitoring requirements are necessary for compliance with other CCRMU requirements, EPA is aligning these remaining CCRMU compliance deadlines.

EPA has proposed to approve North Dakota’s CCR program application, which would allow the state to manage coal ash disposal in surface impoundments and landfills. EPA is also working with Wyoming and other states as they seek to manage their CCR programs without federal oversight.

EPA is accepting comments for 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Unless EPA receives adverse comments, this final rule will be effective six months after publication in the Federal Register.

Additional Resources: 

 

 

 

Posted by Diane Samuels at 6:00 am
SCS Address

Corporate Headquarters

3900 Kilroy Airport Way Suite 300
Long Beach, CA 90806

Telephone

1 (800) 767-4727
1 (562) 427-0805 | FAX
Contact Us

Required Posting
Send us a message
×